A Call to Arms from Starvin’ Naked Marvin: Now!
I’ve ranted against people who wait for the ‘right time’ to move against the forces of injustice. I’ve hammered away at them saying, waiting is the cowards way of putting off a necessary response to injustice. And now I find, I also have been waiting for the right time.
I’m shamed by that realization and act now to confront that shame. It seems I’ve been waiting to make a general call, a ‘call to arms’ for a mass hunger strike. I now end that wait by making the following call:
It’s time for us to realize that no one outside the wall is coming to our rescue, not a god, not a congress person, and not a lawyer. The rescue from years of interminable imprisonment lies within our very hands, our minds, our bodies.
This is a call for the strong, not the weak. By taking up this call you become, trite though it sounds, an army of one. No one can hunger strike with you. If you consider yourself to be weak or think that a hunger strike is a weapon of the weak then this is not a call to you. For it is only the strongest, only the most self sufficient who can continue in fear and loneliness, under threats of violence, violence, and isolation, to maintain their strike every day, every month, every year.
What must you do to become a hunger striker? First, read, understand, and accept the objectives and demands of this strike. Second, notify friends and family that you have joined this strike. Rid yourself of most of your possessions, you will not have access to them after your strike begins. Third, notify me and the prison (Warden & HSU) that you have joined this strike. Fourth, stop eating, stop wearing clothing, and non-violently refuse to follow any prison rules that do not serve your hunger strike.
You will of course be placed in the segregation unit and monitored. After you’ve refused to eat for three days a court order must be obtained to force feed you, the prison may wait longer.
Refuse to voluntarily submit to or walk to the forced feedings. Lay naked on your bed in the submission position: face down; on your stomach; hands crossed behind your back; legs crossed at the ankles; and your face turned toward the nearest wall, and DO NOT offer any physical resistance to the guards or the forced feeding procedure.
The forced feeding procedure is neither unbearable nor lengthy. In less than fifteen minutes you will be chained up, strapped into a restraint chair, intubated by passing a thin plastic tube through your nose into your stomach through which the food supplement will be poured, untubed, unstrapped from the chair, placed back on your bed and left in your cage. Stay wrapped in your sheets and blankets to maintain your warmth between feedings.
An admonishment: The objective of this strike is not your death, it is the destruction of the Wisconsin DOJ/DOC through the disruption of its daily activities, the exacerbation of its budgetary problems, and the embarrassment of the State of Wisconsin before the nation and the world, and the acceptance, by the State, of our demands. The strong understand that their death is a possibility, as it is in all wars for freedom and justice, but it is not the objective.
Our hunger strike is a necessary act of civil disobedience, it is an inherent right of Americans, who believe their government is acting in either a lawless or corrupt fashion, to protest those actions through civil disobedience. I assert that it is more than a right, it is a duty of Americans to stand in protest of government actions that abuse the laws and the lawmaking process for politically driven ends, and an affront to the humanity of its citizens, both of which are current maladies of the Wisconsin justice system.
This is a call for people who can maintain not ‘passive resistance’, but ‘passive aggression’ to confront and defeat an injustice that blemishes the very character of America and diminishes every person, be they prisoner, guard, or free person, that it touches.
The hunger strike in a prison environment must be passively pursued to present to the public a sympathetic face, countering its expectation of violence. Yet it must also be an aggressive attack on the budgets of each prison, the DOC, the DOJ, and ultimately the wallets of the Wisconsin taxpayer. each year the Wisconsin DOJ/DOC is forced to spend a minimum of $200,000 in staff overtime and administrative overhead to manage my hunger strike, it has no choice in the matter, hunger strikers must be force fed.
To reduce the burden of my strike upon any particular prison’s budget, I am moved every four to five months to another prison. To date I’ve been in eight separate prisons (RCI, DCI,RGCI,SCI,FLCI,JCI,NLCI,& WCI) and twice to two of them. No prison, after experiencing my strike, wants me back. Imagine the effect of numerous hunger strikers on the DOJ/DOC budget and the prison staffs. It is this picture of budgetary devastation and staffing nightmares that is the ‘aggressive’ in this passive aggressive hunger strike.
We must be honest with ourselves, public sympathy with our strike will not move the public to action, but the costs of such a massive strike will move the public and then the legislators to action. When we force that movement upon the public and the legislators we must be ready and unified to present our demands. And, as we will surely be kept separated we must go into this agreed upon those demands.
There are five demands I’ve been pushing since I began my strike four years ago, they are:
1. The release from prison of all Americans held for nonviolent social conflict, and the prohibition of the imprisonment of the nonviolent. It is both a moral and fiscal irresponsibility to imprison nonviolent Americans when community-based options would better serve the individual and the nation.
2. A constitutional limit on the number of Americans that can be held by any authority (federal, state, county, city) to 1 in 1250 per U.S. census count, and the planned quadrennially downward revision of this limit as a spur to improving the delivery of educational and social services.
3. A consolidation of state laws which govern imprisonment into national (non-federal) laws. We are a nation of people not a nation of states, the laws which govern our freedoms must be uniform in order to remove regional biases.
4. The prohibition of the practices of parole and probation. As imprisonment has a negligibly positive effect in changing the behavior of individuals even less is that behavior changed by parole and probation. They serve no purpose other than to extend imprisonment and to entrap those least likely to obey excessive restrictions on their freedoms.
5. The prohibition of the practice of disenfranchisement and the re-enfranchisement of all disenfranchised Americans. There must be an end to retribution, to perpetually punish an individual who has served time for a wrong done is a wrong in itself. The intrusion of government into an individual’s life should always be minimal and done to restore him to society not to permanently alienate him.
I now add a sixth demand to the list:
A base, a sea change in the philosophy of State and Federal government, a shift from politically centered to human centered laws by the adoption of the principles of Fiscally Responsible Humanism.
Fiscally Responsible Humanism
Fiscally Responsible Humanism is a philosophy of government that when applied to the creation of laws sets the enhancement of the values, capacities, and worth of its citizens as government’s primary law making goal, and requires that this goal be achieved in a fiscally responsible manner.
Laws created under this philosophy must pass through four filters:
1. It must make sense: The proposed law must be logically and morally sound, the reasoning supporting its implementation must be logically irrefutable, and its resulting effect morally consistent with the nation's ethical standards;
2. It must do no harm: No law passed must harm the individuals it will affect and especially it must do no harm to those indirectly affected who have no recourse, the focus of government must always be toward the enhancement of its citizens lives;
3. It must solve the problem: The law must do what it was designed to do, laws targeted to specific issues must effectively and narrowly address those issues and timely bring about a diminution of the problem, and;
4. It must be fiscally responsible: A cost versus benefit analysis must be part of every proposed law, that analysis must include: 1) the demographics of the affected population, 2) the cost to implement and enforce the law, 3) the cost of the projected custodial and/or rehabilitative services, and 4) a comparison of alternate, less expensive solutions.
I urge all hunger strikers to adopt, in their entirety, these six demands. It is through the adoption of these demands that even though we can not gather to fight this injustice yet we will be unified, as a powerful force, in our individual strikes.
Why do these demands select only the non violent for help? The answer is this, the public has less fear of the non violent and though public sympathy will never rise to a sufficient level to bring action in support of the non violent just for their sake, it will rise more readily, in support of releasing the non violent to remove the budgetary strain on the public wallet caused by a massive hunger strike for their release than it would if it feared the release of violent individuals.
Once we’ve successfully begun the process of prison population reduction, which consequentially reduces the power and influence of the prison industry, we can introduce the subject of the proper treatment of the violent, who now simply face lengthy confinement without adequate treatment for their release.
When I speak of releasing the non violent I do not mean that in every case, no supervision is warranted. I mean release from prison to be managed by community based programs which address the cause of the social conflict but keeps the individual in his/her community. Community based programs which provide continuing education, drug treatment, psychological services, out patient and in patient care, an/or public service have all proven more effective and less costly than imprisonment. Yet, Wisconsin, year after year, continues to waste tax dollars in this fruitless pursuit to punish citizens instead of increasing their value, capacity, and worth, in an effort to change their behavior. Wisconsin’s failure to correct its actions is based upon politically based nonsense taken to the ultimate harmful effect of the needless destruction of human lives.
Our army-of-one hunger strike will force Wisconsin to adopt community based programs for handling non violent social conflicts, and Fiscally Responsible Humanism in the production of its laws. Our success is inevitable as we, as strong individuals, are unstoppable by threats of force. For as we are passive, how can force be legally applied to stop us? And, as we are aggressively eating away at the DOJ/DOC budget, there, likewise is no response that can be applied to stop us. How then can we fail to succeed? The answer is that success is inevitable for the strong.
Large numbers of hunger strikers will not come forth nor does this campaign require large numbers to succeed. It requires you, as an individual, see the simplicity, the power, and the inevitability of the success of this method. I predict our numbers will be astounding but also predict that those who take up this call will see their sacrifice come to fruition.
One last prediction: This strike will spread past the borders of Wisconsin.
Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Jr. DOC # 447655, WCI is Starvin’ naked Marvin (SNM), and Chairman of the Campaign for Fiscally Responsible Humanism in Government
Friday, February 13, 2009
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Hunger Strike Continues
Hunger Strike Continues
by Warren Lilly #447655
New Lisbon Correctional
A friend of mine, upon hearing that I’d been maced and tazered by the guards at New Lisbon prison, urged me to “make them earn their pay” by continuing my hunger strike. I appreciate the support. I’ve refused prison food and authority for over four years and will not bow down, even to escalating violence.
However, something bothered me about my friend’s statement of support. That something was his unwillingness to “make them earn their pay.” During my four years of hunger striking I’ve met hundreds of prisoners who’ve stood behind my strike, way, way behind it. So far behind that they actually became invisible. I could still hear their distant and muffled shouts of “Go for it!”, but I just couldn’t see who was shouting it.
Such distant support makes it impossible t fight anything but a very lopsided war. One where the enemy, the Justice system, freely and purposely destroys our lives while we, the prisoners, just as freely give up our lives and freedoms.
We cower in the face of the imagined indestructibility of our enemy. We make it easy for our enemy to scorn, despise, and abuse us. We believe their propaganda that says we we are worthless and powerless, and that they have the right to control and waste our lives.
We fear to take even the riskless chances to fight for freedom and life or to assert our personhood. Less than a hundred of the twenty-two thousand prisoners answered my call to fast with me on Sundays then to send our moralless governor a letter demanding change.
To those who fasted I send my heartfelt thanks and ask you to continue fasting and recruit others. Hold a “fast-in” after the skipped meals to gather and write letters of support for the cause and protest of imprisonment to the governor.
To those who fear to fast, I ask what risk is there in forsaking a meal in support of a stand, or writing a letter of protest? We have let our fears conquer our personhood and rule our reason, and by doing so have abandoned life and liberty in favor of the false safety of cowardice.
I’m reminded of the time in my youth when people would say “when the revolution comes I’m gonna...” Well, the revolution never came because no one brought it forth. Now, like then, people sit and wait for others to blaze the trail so that they can travel it without sacrifice, without difficulty, without personal strife.
I waited forty years for the revolution to come. I let the world go from bad to worse, and now at nearly sixty years of age, the truth has dawned on me, a very simple truth: If it’s to be, it’s up to me.
“If it’s to be, it’s up to me”. So powerful a revelation in such a simple and yet painfully obvious truth. A god is not coming to save me or make right the wrongs of others, good is not about to spring from bad nor virtue from evil, and the only thing that will happen to those who treat me cruelly is that they will prosper upon my misery. Those are the lessons of life. Another lesson, a hope filled one, is that those who strive for justice and peace and freedom achieve it.
The revolution is here, the revolution is now, do something to sustain it, stand up for something. Begin by reading the letter to the governor and understanding this protest, then hold a “fast-in” and get those letters mailed. Find a non-violent way to “make them earn their pay”.
Stop buying the propaganda that your life is worthless, that you are powerless, and that they have the right to control and waste your life. Stop cowering before the paper tigers and giant shadows cast by imperious runts. Abandon your fears, be driven by the simple truth, “If it’s to be, it’s up to me”.
by Warren Lilly #447655
New Lisbon Correctional
A friend of mine, upon hearing that I’d been maced and tazered by the guards at New Lisbon prison, urged me to “make them earn their pay” by continuing my hunger strike. I appreciate the support. I’ve refused prison food and authority for over four years and will not bow down, even to escalating violence.
However, something bothered me about my friend’s statement of support. That something was his unwillingness to “make them earn their pay.” During my four years of hunger striking I’ve met hundreds of prisoners who’ve stood behind my strike, way, way behind it. So far behind that they actually became invisible. I could still hear their distant and muffled shouts of “Go for it!”, but I just couldn’t see who was shouting it.
Such distant support makes it impossible t fight anything but a very lopsided war. One where the enemy, the Justice system, freely and purposely destroys our lives while we, the prisoners, just as freely give up our lives and freedoms.
We cower in the face of the imagined indestructibility of our enemy. We make it easy for our enemy to scorn, despise, and abuse us. We believe their propaganda that says we we are worthless and powerless, and that they have the right to control and waste our lives.
We fear to take even the riskless chances to fight for freedom and life or to assert our personhood. Less than a hundred of the twenty-two thousand prisoners answered my call to fast with me on Sundays then to send our moralless governor a letter demanding change.
To those who fasted I send my heartfelt thanks and ask you to continue fasting and recruit others. Hold a “fast-in” after the skipped meals to gather and write letters of support for the cause and protest of imprisonment to the governor.
To those who fear to fast, I ask what risk is there in forsaking a meal in support of a stand, or writing a letter of protest? We have let our fears conquer our personhood and rule our reason, and by doing so have abandoned life and liberty in favor of the false safety of cowardice.
I’m reminded of the time in my youth when people would say “when the revolution comes I’m gonna...” Well, the revolution never came because no one brought it forth. Now, like then, people sit and wait for others to blaze the trail so that they can travel it without sacrifice, without difficulty, without personal strife.
I waited forty years for the revolution to come. I let the world go from bad to worse, and now at nearly sixty years of age, the truth has dawned on me, a very simple truth: If it’s to be, it’s up to me.
“If it’s to be, it’s up to me”. So powerful a revelation in such a simple and yet painfully obvious truth. A god is not coming to save me or make right the wrongs of others, good is not about to spring from bad nor virtue from evil, and the only thing that will happen to those who treat me cruelly is that they will prosper upon my misery. Those are the lessons of life. Another lesson, a hope filled one, is that those who strive for justice and peace and freedom achieve it.
The revolution is here, the revolution is now, do something to sustain it, stand up for something. Begin by reading the letter to the governor and understanding this protest, then hold a “fast-in” and get those letters mailed. Find a non-violent way to “make them earn their pay”.
Stop buying the propaganda that your life is worthless, that you are powerless, and that they have the right to control and waste your life. Stop cowering before the paper tigers and giant shadows cast by imperious runts. Abandon your fears, be driven by the simple truth, “If it’s to be, it’s up to me”.
The Day After
Notes from Starvin’ Naked Marvin: The Day After
What does Barack Obama’s election mean for Black prisoners?
Very little and a great deal. Very little in that it’s unlikely he’ll make sweeping changes to the justice system. Obama was not elected on a platform for social change, he ran and won with an economic agenda and was supported by the same money ‘strokers’ that have supported every president. IF Blacks, especially those imprisoned, expect social change they’re going to be disappointed.
Obama’s election though, in a psychological sense, means a great deal to prisoners. Prisoners are quicker than free persons to believe they can not fight and win against an entrenched system and that color is an inherent bar to success. Obama has shown that the bar to success of Black men is mostly a bar of their own making, a self-imposed limit on how high they can climb.
Obama’s victory is a classic lesson in vision and persistence all prisoners should study, especially Black prisoners. For in that lesson is the means to overcome the horrors of both imprisonment and the justice system. His victory instructs us to first recognize our own worth and to respect the worth of others, then to establish a goal and pursue it through planning and preparation, and finally, most importantly, to embrace a single-minded focus toward achieving that goal.
Obama’s victory has shown us that even ‘blue sky’ is not limited to one who’s determined to achieve a goal. How then can we, given his example, fail to take on and defeat the problems of injustice and imprisonment we face?
Let me propose a goal for all prisoners: The reduction and reformation of the prison system into a more human-centered service through the non-violent destabilization of the current dehumanizing system. Prisons operate efficiently and effectively because we prisoners allow them to do so. Without our support, mentally by obeying orders, and physically by working in prisons, the prison system, as it now stands, would collapse. This is a fact we’ve known but have been afraid to exploit.
To achieve this goal we must first set aside our fear. Fear is the mind killer, it prevents self defense. For unless you are willing to abandon your fears and risk everything you stand to gain nothing. Ask yourself if your life has value and worth not just to you but also those with whom you interact - your family, your friends. If you answer is yes then you must vigorously defend your life from the ravages of a system which as declared your life worthless.
Since, to this system, you’re only a body give them that body without its mind. Do not perform any function or obey any order which supports the orderly running of any prison. Non-violently refuse to be an intelligent but willing victim of a rogue system. Refuse to accept their pronouncement of you as worthless. Make them work like hell to maintain you and this system.
In this country we’ve allowed morality and conscience to be replacement with bad laws. To obey such law is to deny your humanity and the responsibility you bear, as an American , to raise protest in the face of injustice.
Look to President-Elect Obama as your inspiration towards this goal. It only seems like ‘blue sky’ because we fear to fight for our worth.
Warren G. Lilly, Jr.,, pen name Starvin’ Naked Marvin, has been hunger striking for over four years in protest of Wisconsin’s and America’s abusive overuse of imprisonment. He refuses to eat, wear clothing, and obey orders, and is force fed thrice daily, Monday through Saturday. Warren asks prisoners and free persons to fast with him every Sunday then to e-mail or write to their Governor in support of his protest.
Contact Warren at: Warren G. Lilly, Jr.
DOC # 447655
WCI, P.O. Box 351
Waupun, WI 53963-0351
What does Barack Obama’s election mean for Black prisoners?
Very little and a great deal. Very little in that it’s unlikely he’ll make sweeping changes to the justice system. Obama was not elected on a platform for social change, he ran and won with an economic agenda and was supported by the same money ‘strokers’ that have supported every president. IF Blacks, especially those imprisoned, expect social change they’re going to be disappointed.
Obama’s election though, in a psychological sense, means a great deal to prisoners. Prisoners are quicker than free persons to believe they can not fight and win against an entrenched system and that color is an inherent bar to success. Obama has shown that the bar to success of Black men is mostly a bar of their own making, a self-imposed limit on how high they can climb.
Obama’s victory is a classic lesson in vision and persistence all prisoners should study, especially Black prisoners. For in that lesson is the means to overcome the horrors of both imprisonment and the justice system. His victory instructs us to first recognize our own worth and to respect the worth of others, then to establish a goal and pursue it through planning and preparation, and finally, most importantly, to embrace a single-minded focus toward achieving that goal.
Obama’s victory has shown us that even ‘blue sky’ is not limited to one who’s determined to achieve a goal. How then can we, given his example, fail to take on and defeat the problems of injustice and imprisonment we face?
Let me propose a goal for all prisoners: The reduction and reformation of the prison system into a more human-centered service through the non-violent destabilization of the current dehumanizing system. Prisons operate efficiently and effectively because we prisoners allow them to do so. Without our support, mentally by obeying orders, and physically by working in prisons, the prison system, as it now stands, would collapse. This is a fact we’ve known but have been afraid to exploit.
To achieve this goal we must first set aside our fear. Fear is the mind killer, it prevents self defense. For unless you are willing to abandon your fears and risk everything you stand to gain nothing. Ask yourself if your life has value and worth not just to you but also those with whom you interact - your family, your friends. If you answer is yes then you must vigorously defend your life from the ravages of a system which as declared your life worthless.
Since, to this system, you’re only a body give them that body without its mind. Do not perform any function or obey any order which supports the orderly running of any prison. Non-violently refuse to be an intelligent but willing victim of a rogue system. Refuse to accept their pronouncement of you as worthless. Make them work like hell to maintain you and this system.
In this country we’ve allowed morality and conscience to be replacement with bad laws. To obey such law is to deny your humanity and the responsibility you bear, as an American , to raise protest in the face of injustice.
Look to President-Elect Obama as your inspiration towards this goal. It only seems like ‘blue sky’ because we fear to fight for our worth.
Warren G. Lilly, Jr.,, pen name Starvin’ Naked Marvin, has been hunger striking for over four years in protest of Wisconsin’s and America’s abusive overuse of imprisonment. He refuses to eat, wear clothing, and obey orders, and is force fed thrice daily, Monday through Saturday. Warren asks prisoners and free persons to fast with him every Sunday then to e-mail or write to their Governor in support of his protest.
Contact Warren at: Warren G. Lilly, Jr.
DOC # 447655
WCI, P.O. Box 351
Waupun, WI 53963-0351
Presidential Pardon request
Warren G. Lilly, Jr.
DOC # 447655
NLCI, P.O. Box 4000
New Lisbon, WI 53950
President George Bush
White House
Washington D.C.
Open request for Presidential pardon and executive order
Dear Mr. President,
I am Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Jr., further information pertinent to who I am, that explains my situation and stance, is appended to this request. I come to you as a supplicant in the name of destitute Americans who need your help, and as, I believe, an accurate and a timely indicator of this nation’s need for the healing gesture I’m soliciting.
What I’m asking and why
At the end of each president’s term in office comes a time of reflection when he considers the impact of his presidency on America. Traditionally this has been the time when Presidents looked to closing the rifts and healing the wounds of the nation.
One way Presidents have done this was to issue pardons to Americans who have been imprisoned but the circumstances of their situation cry out for redress. I write this letter to implore you to continue this tradition and to take it a step beyond what your predecessors have done. I am asking you to release from prison, by Presidential pardon, all Americans imprisoned for nonviolent social conflicts, and to issue an executive order removing the use of federal funds for the imprisonment of nonviolent Americans.
America’s justice system has come to reflect not the best aspects of our nation’s character but its worst. It is one of the last hold outs of institutionalized racism and classism. It boasts racially biased statistics that should any other country have produced them would result in America’s cries for actions against it. Yet when those same statistics come before state and federal congresses silence punctuated by halfhearted rumblings is their only response to them.
Fear of the appearance of being soft on crime prevents law makers from acknowledging the reality that the current laws and their targeted application have definite immoral and un-American biases and tend to victimize those least capable of defending themselves against unjust laws.
As a statistical example consider that the prison population of Wisconsin, a state with a Black population of less than six percent and a white population of around ninety percent, consist of fifty percent black prisoners and only forty-five percent white. Statistically, this implies that Wisconsin blacks are sixteen (16) times more criminal than its whites, and when just the age group eighteen to thirty is considered that comparison goes up to twenty (20) times more criminal. Only the impact of racism in Wisconsin’s justice system accurately explains this statistical improbability - a holocaustic misapplication of law.
Yet Wisconsin is not atypical among the states. Across this country similarly biased statistics can be gleaned from the so-called application of justice against the minorities, the mentally ill, and the illiterate.
Most distressing is the increasing application of imprisonment for nonviolent social conflicts especially when the rate of violent social conflicts, since the early eighties, has been decreasing. At a time when America should have been decreasing its prison population it, instead, turned to the nonviolent to continue the pernicious growth of its prison industry.
Why the pardon and edict should be issued.
America, which proudly boasts of the freedoms of its people, has the distinct dishonor of being the world’s largest imprisoner of its citizens. At only five percent (5%) of the world’s population, America holds twenty-five percent (25%) of the world’s prisoners, no so-called rogue state comes near that shameful statistic.
Some estimates hold that seventy to eighty percent of those imprisoned are nonviolent. What then is the basis upon which we project our vaunted respect for individual freedoms when in no other country are the nonviolent more likely to be imprisoned?
American politics has hoisted itself upon the petard of being ‘tough on crime’, a politically defined moral stand that has inevitably lead to an intractable and socially devastating position. It is now impossible for those who realize the tragic error of that stance to make public their retraction as fear mongers await to paint them as ‘soft on crime’.
A pardon and executive order would remove that self-imposed yoke and give voice to those who wish to end the current Draconian laws and replace imprisonment with fiscally responsible humanistic alternatives. It would remove the fear of doing right by legislators who’ve long since recognized the wrong, the societal harm of abusive over imprisonment. It wold begin to untie the hands of judges who have no tool except imprisonment to deal with social conflicts. It would end the growth of a prison system that has proven to be both ineffective and destructive to the moral, social, and economic well-being of this nation.
The justice system cannot correct itself, it has lost sight of its purpose, there is no humanity within it from which the impetus for reform can spring. Without a drastic reduction it can no longer be controlled to meet the needs of a progressive, human-centered society. Its politically tainted existence mocks America’s claim of respect for individual rights and freedoms, reflects the inner darkness of American politics, and highlights America’s resistance to purge from within itself the very systemic horrors over which it has fought wars against other nations.
By issuing the pardon and executive order you give America the beginnings of a chance to clear the ground and buildup a justice system that reflects the cultural and social, not the politically driven, needs of America, and you free Americans from the shackles of 17th century practices against the needs of a 21st century society.
Historical Precedents
There are precedents which support the scope of the pardon and executive order I’m requesting: Presidents, congress, and governors have used pardons, amnesties, clemencies and other acts to heal and to advance the nation past its troubled times, even when the nation itself was ambivalent toward, reticent to , or unmindful of the need for the act.
After the Civil War, despite the fact that the Confederacy had taken up arms against the nation, the confederate soldiers were pardoned because a healing gesture was needed to make the nation whole. Likewise after the Vietnam War American draft dodgers, who’d fled the country rather than fight its war, were offered a conditional amnesty which allowed them to come home from self-imposed exile.
Even a former president has benefited from the need of the nation to be healed of a socially dividing and morally conflicting trauma. President Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon for his violation of the public trust was necessary to prevent the possible destruction of the nation’s executive body that could have been caused by a long and detailed trial. The nation benefited far more by that pardon than did Mr. Nixon.
Governors also have acted to heal wounds inflicted upon citizens by unjust laws. A case in point is ex-governor Ryan’s stay of all executions in Illinois to prevent the continuation of the application of an unconscionable racial bias in his state’s death penalty. His action saved the lives of many wrongly sentenced to death, and precipitated the beginning of a closing of the rift between the races and the laws presumed to apply equally to all.
One more precedent, though I admit it’s far of field, is the world changing actions of former Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev. In responding to then President Ronald Reagan’s call to “tear down that wall” by tearing down the Berlin Wall, and later, of his own accord, implementing the policies of Perestroika and Glasnost, Premier Gorbachev acted to heal the world of its Cold War aches and pains, and by doing so achieved a noteworthy place in history.
Judgment of History
The people who now suffer imprisonment under America’s misguided and politically motivated fear of social conflict must, like the Confederate soldiers and the draft dodgers of the Vietnam era, be forgiven for their transgressions against the nation in order to allow America to be healed of the greater transgression against citizens by a politically fueled justice system.
I call upon you Mr. Bush to echo Mr. Gorbachev’s global healing gesture by tearing down the walls of imprisonment which separate the hundreds of thousands of nonviolent citizens from even the possibility of recovery or rehabilitation. Such a gesture, by its very nature, would cause a new age in America to pivot around your presidency.
When history judges you what will it choose as your crowning moment, your glowing achievement? Let it be the human moment when you reached out to heal the nation of an old, deep, and festering wound caused by the biased and misguided misapplication of justice. Let it be your achievement in making it possible for legislators and judges, across the country, to remove injustice from the backs of those least capable of defending themselves and of restoring to them their human and civil rights, and the blessings of liberty. Let it not be for the opportunity you missed to set America firmly upon a humanistic and progressive path.
Do for the states what political fears will not allow them to do for themselves, what humanity cries out for, give them the way, the opportunity, the moral platform from which they may rescind the established injustices of our current system.
End the nation’s unconscionable waste of the lives of hundreds of thousands , if not millions, of nonviolent Americans. End the collateral damage that this waste imposes upon their loved ones, and end the violation of the government’s duty to enhance the lives of all its citizens.
Make the gesture Mr. Bush for as with Mr. Nixon’s pardon it will be the nation that benefits far more than any prisoner. I implore you to close the rift, heal the wound, wipe the slate, tear down those walls.
With respect and in hope,
Warren G. Lilly. Jr.
cc: To those whom it does concern
DOC # 447655
NLCI, P.O. Box 4000
New Lisbon, WI 53950
President George Bush
White House
Washington D.C.
Open request for Presidential pardon and executive order
Dear Mr. President,
I am Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Jr., further information pertinent to who I am, that explains my situation and stance, is appended to this request. I come to you as a supplicant in the name of destitute Americans who need your help, and as, I believe, an accurate and a timely indicator of this nation’s need for the healing gesture I’m soliciting.
What I’m asking and why
At the end of each president’s term in office comes a time of reflection when he considers the impact of his presidency on America. Traditionally this has been the time when Presidents looked to closing the rifts and healing the wounds of the nation.
One way Presidents have done this was to issue pardons to Americans who have been imprisoned but the circumstances of their situation cry out for redress. I write this letter to implore you to continue this tradition and to take it a step beyond what your predecessors have done. I am asking you to release from prison, by Presidential pardon, all Americans imprisoned for nonviolent social conflicts, and to issue an executive order removing the use of federal funds for the imprisonment of nonviolent Americans.
America’s justice system has come to reflect not the best aspects of our nation’s character but its worst. It is one of the last hold outs of institutionalized racism and classism. It boasts racially biased statistics that should any other country have produced them would result in America’s cries for actions against it. Yet when those same statistics come before state and federal congresses silence punctuated by halfhearted rumblings is their only response to them.
Fear of the appearance of being soft on crime prevents law makers from acknowledging the reality that the current laws and their targeted application have definite immoral and un-American biases and tend to victimize those least capable of defending themselves against unjust laws.
As a statistical example consider that the prison population of Wisconsin, a state with a Black population of less than six percent and a white population of around ninety percent, consist of fifty percent black prisoners and only forty-five percent white. Statistically, this implies that Wisconsin blacks are sixteen (16) times more criminal than its whites, and when just the age group eighteen to thirty is considered that comparison goes up to twenty (20) times more criminal. Only the impact of racism in Wisconsin’s justice system accurately explains this statistical improbability - a holocaustic misapplication of law.
Yet Wisconsin is not atypical among the states. Across this country similarly biased statistics can be gleaned from the so-called application of justice against the minorities, the mentally ill, and the illiterate.
Most distressing is the increasing application of imprisonment for nonviolent social conflicts especially when the rate of violent social conflicts, since the early eighties, has been decreasing. At a time when America should have been decreasing its prison population it, instead, turned to the nonviolent to continue the pernicious growth of its prison industry.
Why the pardon and edict should be issued.
America, which proudly boasts of the freedoms of its people, has the distinct dishonor of being the world’s largest imprisoner of its citizens. At only five percent (5%) of the world’s population, America holds twenty-five percent (25%) of the world’s prisoners, no so-called rogue state comes near that shameful statistic.
Some estimates hold that seventy to eighty percent of those imprisoned are nonviolent. What then is the basis upon which we project our vaunted respect for individual freedoms when in no other country are the nonviolent more likely to be imprisoned?
American politics has hoisted itself upon the petard of being ‘tough on crime’, a politically defined moral stand that has inevitably lead to an intractable and socially devastating position. It is now impossible for those who realize the tragic error of that stance to make public their retraction as fear mongers await to paint them as ‘soft on crime’.
A pardon and executive order would remove that self-imposed yoke and give voice to those who wish to end the current Draconian laws and replace imprisonment with fiscally responsible humanistic alternatives. It would remove the fear of doing right by legislators who’ve long since recognized the wrong, the societal harm of abusive over imprisonment. It wold begin to untie the hands of judges who have no tool except imprisonment to deal with social conflicts. It would end the growth of a prison system that has proven to be both ineffective and destructive to the moral, social, and economic well-being of this nation.
The justice system cannot correct itself, it has lost sight of its purpose, there is no humanity within it from which the impetus for reform can spring. Without a drastic reduction it can no longer be controlled to meet the needs of a progressive, human-centered society. Its politically tainted existence mocks America’s claim of respect for individual rights and freedoms, reflects the inner darkness of American politics, and highlights America’s resistance to purge from within itself the very systemic horrors over which it has fought wars against other nations.
By issuing the pardon and executive order you give America the beginnings of a chance to clear the ground and buildup a justice system that reflects the cultural and social, not the politically driven, needs of America, and you free Americans from the shackles of 17th century practices against the needs of a 21st century society.
Historical Precedents
There are precedents which support the scope of the pardon and executive order I’m requesting: Presidents, congress, and governors have used pardons, amnesties, clemencies and other acts to heal and to advance the nation past its troubled times, even when the nation itself was ambivalent toward, reticent to , or unmindful of the need for the act.
After the Civil War, despite the fact that the Confederacy had taken up arms against the nation, the confederate soldiers were pardoned because a healing gesture was needed to make the nation whole. Likewise after the Vietnam War American draft dodgers, who’d fled the country rather than fight its war, were offered a conditional amnesty which allowed them to come home from self-imposed exile.
Even a former president has benefited from the need of the nation to be healed of a socially dividing and morally conflicting trauma. President Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon for his violation of the public trust was necessary to prevent the possible destruction of the nation’s executive body that could have been caused by a long and detailed trial. The nation benefited far more by that pardon than did Mr. Nixon.
Governors also have acted to heal wounds inflicted upon citizens by unjust laws. A case in point is ex-governor Ryan’s stay of all executions in Illinois to prevent the continuation of the application of an unconscionable racial bias in his state’s death penalty. His action saved the lives of many wrongly sentenced to death, and precipitated the beginning of a closing of the rift between the races and the laws presumed to apply equally to all.
One more precedent, though I admit it’s far of field, is the world changing actions of former Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev. In responding to then President Ronald Reagan’s call to “tear down that wall” by tearing down the Berlin Wall, and later, of his own accord, implementing the policies of Perestroika and Glasnost, Premier Gorbachev acted to heal the world of its Cold War aches and pains, and by doing so achieved a noteworthy place in history.
Judgment of History
The people who now suffer imprisonment under America’s misguided and politically motivated fear of social conflict must, like the Confederate soldiers and the draft dodgers of the Vietnam era, be forgiven for their transgressions against the nation in order to allow America to be healed of the greater transgression against citizens by a politically fueled justice system.
I call upon you Mr. Bush to echo Mr. Gorbachev’s global healing gesture by tearing down the walls of imprisonment which separate the hundreds of thousands of nonviolent citizens from even the possibility of recovery or rehabilitation. Such a gesture, by its very nature, would cause a new age in America to pivot around your presidency.
When history judges you what will it choose as your crowning moment, your glowing achievement? Let it be the human moment when you reached out to heal the nation of an old, deep, and festering wound caused by the biased and misguided misapplication of justice. Let it be your achievement in making it possible for legislators and judges, across the country, to remove injustice from the backs of those least capable of defending themselves and of restoring to them their human and civil rights, and the blessings of liberty. Let it not be for the opportunity you missed to set America firmly upon a humanistic and progressive path.
Do for the states what political fears will not allow them to do for themselves, what humanity cries out for, give them the way, the opportunity, the moral platform from which they may rescind the established injustices of our current system.
End the nation’s unconscionable waste of the lives of hundreds of thousands , if not millions, of nonviolent Americans. End the collateral damage that this waste imposes upon their loved ones, and end the violation of the government’s duty to enhance the lives of all its citizens.
Make the gesture Mr. Bush for as with Mr. Nixon’s pardon it will be the nation that benefits far more than any prisoner. I implore you to close the rift, heal the wound, wipe the slate, tear down those walls.
With respect and in hope,
Warren G. Lilly. Jr.
cc: To those whom it does concern
Biography
Biography of Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Jr.
Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Jr. Is the son of Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Sr. and Carrie Louise Dixon Lilly Akins. He was born in Birmingham, Alabama on January 16, 1951. His family consists of five brothers, five sisters, two daughters, and numerous nieces, nephews, and cousins.
He served in the U.S. Air Force, has a Bachelor’s degree in Physics and Computer Science, and credits towards his Masters in Computer Science. For nearly twenty years he was the sole proprietor of Lilly Consulting and System Services in Milwaukee, WIsconsin.
He is a secular humanist who believes that the humanity of a person arises not from externally applied laws but from intrinsic values universally shared by all people, and that the primary duty of government is to enhance the value, capacity and worth of all its citizens.
Since 2003 he has been imprisoned on a domestic violence charge, and since 2004 he has been hunger striking to protest his illegal imprisonment and the abusive overuse of imprisonment, particularly as it has been applied to nonviolent Americans. In protest he does not eat, wear clothing or recognize the authority of the state to hold him without fair trial. He is chained and force-fed thrice daily Monday through Saturday.
Warren Lilly’s hunger strike objectives
The five objectives of his hunger strike are:
1. The release from prison of all Americans held for nonviolent social conflict, and the prohibition of the imprisonment of the nonviolent. It is both a moral and fiscal irresponsibility to imprison nonviolent Americans when community-based options would better serve the individual and the nation.
2. A constitutional limit on the number of Americans that can be held by any authority (federal, state, county, city) to 1 in 1250 per U.S. census count, and the planned quadrennially downward revision of this limit as a spur to improving the delivery of educational and social services.
3. A consolidation of state laws which govern imprisonment into national (non-federal) laws. We are a nation of people not a nation of states, the laws which govern our freedoms must be uniform in order to remove regional biases.
4. The prohibition of the practices of parole and probation. As imprisonment has a negligibly positive effect in changing the behavior of individuals even less is that behavior changed by parole and probation. They serve no purpose other than to extend imprisonment and to entrap those least likely to obey excessive restrictions on their freedoms.
5. The prohibition of the practice of disenfranchisement and the re-enfranchisement of all disenfranchised Americans. There must be an end to retribution, to perpetually punish an individual who has served time for a wrong done is a wrong in itself. The intrusion of government into an individual’s life should always be minimal and done to restore him to society not to permanently alienate him.
Fiscally Responsible Humanism
Fiscally Responsible Humanism is a philosophy of government that when applied to the creation of laws sets the enhancement of the values, capacities, and worth of its citizens as government’s primary law making goal, and requires that this goal be achieved in a fiscally responsible manner.
Laws created under this philosophy must pass through four filters:
1. It must make sense: The proposed law must be logically and morally sound, the reasoning supporting its implementation must be logically irrefutable, and its resulting effect morally consistent with the nation's ethical standards;
2. It must do no harm: No law passed must harm the individuals it will affect and especially it must do no harm to those indirectly affected who have no recourse, the focus of government must always be toward the enhancement of its citizens lives;
3. It must solve the problem: The law must do what it was designed to do, laws targeted to specific issues must effectively and narrowly address those issues and timely bring about a diminution of the problem, and;
4. It must be fiscally responsible: A cost versus benefit analysis must be part of every proposed law, that analysis must include: 1) the demographics of the affected population, 2) the cost to implement and enforce the law, 3) the cost of the projected custodial and/or rehabilitative services, and 4) a comparison of alternate, less expensive solutions.
Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Jr. Is the son of Warren Gamaliel Lilly, Sr. and Carrie Louise Dixon Lilly Akins. He was born in Birmingham, Alabama on January 16, 1951. His family consists of five brothers, five sisters, two daughters, and numerous nieces, nephews, and cousins.
He served in the U.S. Air Force, has a Bachelor’s degree in Physics and Computer Science, and credits towards his Masters in Computer Science. For nearly twenty years he was the sole proprietor of Lilly Consulting and System Services in Milwaukee, WIsconsin.
He is a secular humanist who believes that the humanity of a person arises not from externally applied laws but from intrinsic values universally shared by all people, and that the primary duty of government is to enhance the value, capacity and worth of all its citizens.
Since 2003 he has been imprisoned on a domestic violence charge, and since 2004 he has been hunger striking to protest his illegal imprisonment and the abusive overuse of imprisonment, particularly as it has been applied to nonviolent Americans. In protest he does not eat, wear clothing or recognize the authority of the state to hold him without fair trial. He is chained and force-fed thrice daily Monday through Saturday.
Warren Lilly’s hunger strike objectives
The five objectives of his hunger strike are:
1. The release from prison of all Americans held for nonviolent social conflict, and the prohibition of the imprisonment of the nonviolent. It is both a moral and fiscal irresponsibility to imprison nonviolent Americans when community-based options would better serve the individual and the nation.
2. A constitutional limit on the number of Americans that can be held by any authority (federal, state, county, city) to 1 in 1250 per U.S. census count, and the planned quadrennially downward revision of this limit as a spur to improving the delivery of educational and social services.
3. A consolidation of state laws which govern imprisonment into national (non-federal) laws. We are a nation of people not a nation of states, the laws which govern our freedoms must be uniform in order to remove regional biases.
4. The prohibition of the practices of parole and probation. As imprisonment has a negligibly positive effect in changing the behavior of individuals even less is that behavior changed by parole and probation. They serve no purpose other than to extend imprisonment and to entrap those least likely to obey excessive restrictions on their freedoms.
5. The prohibition of the practice of disenfranchisement and the re-enfranchisement of all disenfranchised Americans. There must be an end to retribution, to perpetually punish an individual who has served time for a wrong done is a wrong in itself. The intrusion of government into an individual’s life should always be minimal and done to restore him to society not to permanently alienate him.
Fiscally Responsible Humanism
Fiscally Responsible Humanism is a philosophy of government that when applied to the creation of laws sets the enhancement of the values, capacities, and worth of its citizens as government’s primary law making goal, and requires that this goal be achieved in a fiscally responsible manner.
Laws created under this philosophy must pass through four filters:
1. It must make sense: The proposed law must be logically and morally sound, the reasoning supporting its implementation must be logically irrefutable, and its resulting effect morally consistent with the nation's ethical standards;
2. It must do no harm: No law passed must harm the individuals it will affect and especially it must do no harm to those indirectly affected who have no recourse, the focus of government must always be toward the enhancement of its citizens lives;
3. It must solve the problem: The law must do what it was designed to do, laws targeted to specific issues must effectively and narrowly address those issues and timely bring about a diminution of the problem, and;
4. It must be fiscally responsible: A cost versus benefit analysis must be part of every proposed law, that analysis must include: 1) the demographics of the affected population, 2) the cost to implement and enforce the law, 3) the cost of the projected custodial and/or rehabilitative services, and 4) a comparison of alternate, less expensive solutions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)